And foster continued healthy discourse within and among all of them.
In the current context, it certainly raises several important questions, large and small.
Familiar takes on interests and institutions, among other things.
From more than a decade ago, thoughts an what can best and most reliably be done by foundations.
It’s not so unique. Nor are small, local, hometown ones like it built by national government as easily as the large-scale interstate-highway system.
The arrogance of assuming all people automatically agree with “taking action” on a progressive agenda.
Once giving, volunteering, and self-help are seen by the public for what they have always been to the philanthropic professionals—mere myths that complicate the work of the credentialed experts—what will happen to the legitimacy of those professionals?
The approaches of some grassroots activists and conservative philanthropies are much closer to each other than those flowing from progressivism—which shift power away from the local grassroots to distant intellectual elites, who consider grassroots efforts mere “Band-Aids.”
By suggesting that our vast network of social services isn’t adequate to the task of meeting human needs, the everyday charitable acts of Americans “threaten” to carve out islands of independent civic initiative, free from the heavy-handed guidance and arrogant expertise of philanthropic reformers.
Progressive critiques of private philanthropy ignore prior public experience with government spending.