Prior to his death, Barron Hilton and the Hilton Foundation took measures to protect Conrad Hilton’s donor intent. These are important measures for ensuring donor intent, and time will tell the foundation board’s commitment to these measures.
Barron Hilton died this year at age 91. He was one of three sons of Hilton Hotels founder Conrad Hilton. As Stephen Miller notes in this Bloomberg obituary, Barron Hilton had an adventurous life, including expanding his father’s hotel empire and being the first owner of the San Diego Chargers.
Barron Hilton’s life and legal battles over the Hilton Foundation are an important case study of how donor intent in a perpetual foundation can be preserved. I discuss Hilton in a chapter of my book How Great Philanthropists Failed And How You Can Protect Your Legacy, which includes more lengthy excerpts from documents I am quoting here.
The Conrad N. Hilton Foundation was founded in 1944 but stayed small during Hilton’s lifetime. When Conrad Hilton died in 1979 at age 91, he owned 6.8 million shares of Hilton Hotels, giving him control of 27.8 percent of the corporation’s stock. He could not transfer the entire block of stock to the Hilton Foundation because the Tax Reform Act of 1969 prohibits foundations from owning more than 20 percent of a corporation’s stock.
Conrad Hilton foresaw this difficulty by stating in his will that all of his Hilton Hotels shares would be willed to the Hilton Foundation except those which, according to the Tax Reform Act, were an “excess business holding” that the foundation had to sell. He declared that Barron Hilton had the right to buy these shares at $24.20, their value the day of Conrad Hilton’s death.
The battle between Barron Hilton and the Conrad Hilton Foundation was delayed when Conrad Hilton’s daughter, Francesca Hilton, contested the will, a contest she ultimately lost. The contest then was whether Barron Hilton could buy some of Conrad Hilton’s Hilton Hotels shares, all of them, or none of them. After a great deal of legal maneuvering, including, at one point, a failed mediation attempt by Archbishop Roger Mahony, the trial between Barron Hilton and the Hilton Foundation took place in 1986.
The case then went through three levels of the California courts with some courts ruling in favor of Barron Hilton and others ruling for the Hilton Foundation. Ultimately in 1988 a compromise was reached out of court where Barron Hilton received four million shares, worth $212 million, and the Conrad Hilton Foundation received 3.5 million shares, worth $184 million. The remaining six million shares, worth $315 million, were placed in an irrevocable charitable remainder unitrust, known as the 1989 Barron Hilton Charitable Remainder Unitrust, which, while Barron Hilton was alive, had 60 percent of its income go to Barron Hilton and 40 percent to the Hilton Foundation. The shares of this unitrust, which in 2017 were worth $812 million, will go to the Hilton Foundation.
In 2007, Hilton Hotels was sold to the Blackstone Group, and Barron Hilton also sold $300 million of stock he held in Harrah’s Entertainment. After these sales, Barron Hilton said that nearly all of the income from these sales would benefit the Hilton Foundation. “My father left nearly 97 percent of his wealth to the Conrad N. Hilton Foundation, and I want to follow his example,” Barron Hilton told the New York Times.
Hilton placed the proceeds from these sales in a unitrust known as the 2007 Barron Hilton Charitable Remainder Unitrust, which will now go to the Hilton Foundation. As of 2017, the value of this unitrust is $2.23 billion. Hilton’s donations led the Chronicle of Philanthropy to declare him the most generous American of 2007.
In 2014, when Barron Hilton retired from the Hilton Foundation board, the foundation took additional steps to preserve Conrad Hilton’s donor intent. In 2005, the board declared that a majority of its members would be descendants of Conrad Hilton. In 2014, the board added new bylaws to its articles of incorporation, which stated that the board “shall make distributions and conduct activities in accordance with the philosophy of Conrad N. Hilton, which philosophy includes Conrad N. Hilton’s religious, ethical, business, and conservative beliefs. Specifically, the primary purposes of the corporation over which distributions should be made are to alleviate human suffering, and to aid the distressed, the disadvantaged, and the destitute, without regard to territorial, religious, color, or other discriminating restrictions on the corporation’s benefactions; more specifically, as expressed in Conrad N. Hilton’s Last Will and Testament, support shall be provided to the Catholic Sisters as well as to the needs of children.”
Barron Hilton then signed an agreement with the Conrad N. Hilton Foundation. The four points of this agreement were that Hilton supported his father’s wishes, “including his religious, business, and conservative beliefs” and his father’s “moral obligation to alleviate human suffering and aid the disadvantaged, especially children.”
He disagreed with his father on two points. Conrad Hilton declared that the largest single grantee of the foundation be Catholic Sisters. The foundation created the Conrad Hilton Fund for Sisters, which was operated by the archdiocese of Los Angeles between 1986-2016 and is now an independent nonprofit. Barron Hilton said that he thought that the Sisters should no longer be the Hilton Foundation’s largest grantee, but “future boards, at their discretion” should fund the Sisters, “whom Barron Hilton greatly respects and admires.”
Second, he requested “a very modest portion of Foundation giving shall support the charitable activities of aviation-related organizations, since Barron Hilton has always had a passion for aviation.”
Finally, members of the board had to sign a statement saying that “I hereby commit to honoring the spirit and sentiment” of Conrad Hilton’s will and the 2014 agreement between the Hilton Foundation and Barron Hilton.
With Barron Hilton’s death, the Conrad N. Hilton Foundation now becomes a joint legacy of Conrad N. Hilton and Barron Hilton. It remains to be seen if the intentions of the two Hiltons will be preserved. But the Conrad N. Hilton Foundation deserves a great deal of credit for recognizing that straying from donor intent is a problem and for taking meaningful steps to ensure that the intentions of Conrad N. Hilton and Barron Hilton are followed.